My favorite storytelling rule is if you're going to have a gun set on a mantel in Act 1 and Act 2, it had better go off in Act 3. By the same token, if a gun on the mantel goes off in Act 3, it had better be in sight during the first 2 acts. Don't give the reader (or viewer) all the clues, but don't withhold key items they need to be engaged in your story.
Movies and books occasionally break the storytelling rules. On occasion, it works. Other times, the writer isn't true to his/her characters - and then it leaves the audience feeling cheated.
After getting several pages of my second manuscript edited this morning, I went to see the movie "War." (Okay, I confess - it was mainly because I've seen almost everything else playing and I wanted to stare at Jason Statham for awhile!)
I won't give away the ending for those of you who wish to see it, but I found some interesting aspects to this movie which reinforce how to write better fiction.
- A novel needs conflict and hardships all the way through, not in the last chapter only. I found the first hour or so of "War" quite basic: Triads killing each other. Nothing new in terms of action/adventure plot. But I was on the edge of my seat in the last 30 minutes of the movie, when it finally had some things at stake. This isn't the way books work. Editors and agents only give a manuscript so much time before deciding whether they wish to read on.
- While surprise plot twists intrigue me (and I must admit I didn't see a few of them coming in the movie)--it's also possible to go overboard. Too much twist becomes unbelievable.
- Characters shouldn't act differently in the last chapter (or 15 minutes of the movie) than they have for the preceding 1-1.5 hours. Not believable, which was my issue with "War."
What are your thoughts? How do you feel when storytellers break the rules?